 |
How to improve
customer satisfaction
by Onno van Ewyk
To succeed an organisation
must satisfy its customers. This is a fundamental idea few managers would
challenge but when we evaluate our own history as customers we can all
give example after example of poor products and even worse service we
have experienced.
This contrast between intentions and outcomes reflects the sad fact that
satisfying customers is difficult to do. Managers must try to anticipate
uncertain customer demands, marshal scarce resources, coordinate the activities
of many people working in disparate functions, and at the end of the day
make a profit as well.
Quality management offers two ways to overcome these difficulties. First,
make an overt commitment to 'customer focus' as one of the central values
of the organisation and drive it home by initiating programs to get good
information on customer experiences, by training all staff in customer
relations, and by putting customer needs on the agenda in some way for
every management meeting.
Second, adopt the concept of the 'internal customer'. This is the idea
that even if you are buried deep within an organisation and never see
a customer yourself, your work helps someone who does. That person, or
group of people, become your customers.
These are powerful ideas. Customer focus will ensure that however well
(or badly) you are satisfying customers now, there is a commitment and
impetus to do it better in the future. The 'internal customer' concept
adds to this by involving everyone and connecting corporate activity so
that it is automatically coordinated in the customer's interest.
To plan and control the implementation of these ideas there is a technique
available which enables managers to picture, in the form of a diagram,
all the key elements in the organisation which impact on customer satisfaction.
This technique is called 'Customer/Supplier Mapping' or 'Relationship
Mapping' and it works as follows.
Take a large sheet of paper (or preferably get your management team together
and use a whiteboard) and draw horizontal lines to divide it into four
sections from top to bottom. Label the four sections 'Ultimate', 'Immediate',
'Own', and 'Suppliers' (see diagram).
Beginning at the top, in the section labelled 'Ultimate', write the names
of the types of customers who are the ultimate users of your products
but who you do not deal directly with. For a vehicle manufacturer, for
example, these may be 'car buyers', 'car fleet buyers', and 'rental car
users'.
In the section labelled 'Immediate', write the names of the groups who
serve the ultimate customers and with whom you deal directly (or immediately).
For a vehicle manufacturer these may be 'car dealers' and 'rental fleet
buyers'. Now draw arrows from the ultimate customers pointing to the groups
who serve them. The arrows show the direction in which customer demands
are expressed.
Of course, if you deal directly with any ultimate users of your products
or services place them in the 'Immediate' section.
Working down the map, in the section labelled 'Own' write the names of
the major sections of your company. Draw arrows down to the sections which
interface directly with immediate customers and draw arrows between sections
to reflect how they respond to each other to meet customer needs.
Complete the final section labelled 'Suppliers' by writing in the names
of major supplier groups outside the company and draw arrows down to them
from the sections in the company which deal with them.
What you will have at the end of this exercise is a map showing who and
how customer needs are satisfied. Even if you think you have a clear idea
already, try drawing this type of map to put yourself to the test. You
will discover fuzzy or inappropriate customer classifications, important
intermediate customers previously overlooked, and arrows pointing at each
other indicating confusion (particularly in the 'Own' section) over who
the internal customer is.
These maps can be drawn at all levels in the organisation and need only
show a level of detail appropriate to the area being mapped. How you use
the four levels of relationship is also flexible, for example, 'Own' may
be reserved for a particular department's functions with 'Suppliers' shown
as those providing support from outside the department (but still in the
same organisation).
Apart from clarifying relationships, the map provides a starting point
for relationship management. Each arrow on the map represents a relationship
critical to meeting customer needs. By setting parameters for how well
each relationship should be working, you can home in on those which are
under-performing and set about improving them.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is one of a series of articles written by Phil Cohen and Onno
van Ewyk, HCi . Most of the articles were also published
in the Australian Financial Review. This article may be reproduced only
with the permission of HCi Consulting (email
HCi ). Copyright HCi, 1993-1998.
|